Question 1 (2 marks)
Method
Why should the ruler be dropped without warning?
Show model answer / marking points
To prevent anticipation of the stimulus (1), giving a fairer measurement of response time (1).
Investigate the effect of a chosen factor on human reaction time using a ruler-drop test.
This is a very simple experiment that can be used to incorporate lots of other parts of biology and experimental science. You will basically drop a ruler through a student's open hand. When they see it fall, they grab it. This allows you to calculate means, spot anomalies, compare data and to even calculate time using S=ut + ½at2. You can also use this to test hypotheses like "does caffeine increase reaction rate?" and complete a double blind trial.
Reaction time includes sensing a stimulus, processing it and responding with muscles. A ruler-drop distance can estimate elapsed falling time.
Keep hand and zero mark aligned; drop without warning; repeat measurements; compare means.
Metre rule
chair or desk
results sheet
calculator
stopwatch optional
In groups, select a person to be the tester and the person to be tested.
The tester holds a metre rule above the open hand of the person being tested. Both people should look at the hand of the person being tested so that there are no clues as to when the ruler is going to be dropped.
The tester lets the ruler drop and the person being tested must close their hand around the ruler to catch it. The distance that the ruler falls (in cm) can be converted into seconds.
Repeat this many times and record each reaction time into a table. Swap roles and repeat so that the reaction time of all students can be recorded.
This experiment will allow you to look into the medical trial process too. Once everyone has a "baseline" result, everyone in the class can be given a drink. I provide two trays of drinks, one is diet cola and one is caffeine free diet cola (red cups and white cups. Students are not told which is which. Buy a cheap brand that does not have a distinctive taste - CHECK FOR ALLERGIES etc). After drinking a cup, I discuss that caffeine is supposed to speed up your reactions and students can see if they can work out which.
When complete, look at how robust the method is and look at how it compares with a double blind trial.
| Type of variable | What is measured or controlled? |
|---|---|
| Independent variable | Chosen factor, such as practice or distraction |
| Dependent variable | Distance fallen before catch, or calculated reaction time |
| Control variables | Same ruler; starting position; hand used; drop technique; participant where appropriate |
Follow your teacher's instructions and your school's risk assessment. This page is not a substitute for a formal risk assessment.
| Hazard | Risk | Precaution |
|---|---|---|
Ruler-drop activity |
Fingers struck by ruler or collision |
Use a suitable lightweight ruler and clear working area. |
Human participants |
Discomfort, participation pressure or confidentiality issues |
Gain appropriate consent; allow opt-out; do not collect unnecessary identifying data. |
Record repeated ruler distances (cm), identify anomalies and calculate mean distances or reaction times.
For free fall from rest, time ≈ √(2 × distance in metres ÷ 9.81).
Shorter mean fall distance indicates faster reaction under comparable conditions.
Use repeated trials and a consistent release method; discuss anticipation, fatigue and practice effects.
Allow voluntary participation and avoid routine caffeine-drink challenges. Practice or distraction is a suitable choice of variable.
Report reaction time in seconds; a larger ruler-drop distance means a slower response.
Answer each question in full before opening the model answer. Check your work against the marking points and look for scientific key words.
Method
Why should the ruler be dropped without warning?
To prevent anticipation of the stimulus (1), giving a fairer measurement of response time (1).
Calculation
A ruler falls 0.20 m. Estimate reaction time using t = √(2d/9.81).
t = √(0.40/9.81) (1) = 0.202 s, about 0.20 s (2).
Evaluation
Why use several drops for each participant?
Repeat results reduce the effect of random variation (1) and allow a mean to be calculated (1).
Evaluation
Suggest one improvement to make the investigation more reliable and explain why it helps.
Repeat measurements and calculate a mean (1), reducing the influence of random variation/anomalies (1). Alternative valid improvement specific to the experiment with explanation can gain both marks.
This page was updated on: 12th June 2026